Friday, February 27th, 2009 | Author:

J. D. Tuccille, the Civil Liberties Examiner at Examiner.com, has posted an excellent article entitled, Forget right and left — it’s the control freaks against the rest of us.

It’s not that there aren’t real ideological differences along the political spectrum — there are. But left, right, up or down, there are activists who focus on ways of expanding freedom, and there are activists who focus on ways of extending government control over people’s lives. They may put the emphasis on different issues and strongly disagree on specific policies, but ultimately, righties and lefties who emphasize freedom have more in common with one another than they do with supposed comrades who are obsessed with control.

He makes many valid points in this article, and I encourage you to read the whole thing, but I think the underlying battleground can be traced back to the founding of our country, in the words of the Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

While there exist revolutionary scholars far more qualified than I am, among them my good friend Hercules Mulligan, nonetheless I am going to share my thoughts on this statement.

We hold these truths to be self-evident

Those who formed our country believed in the truth that Webster’s defines as “conformity with fact or reality; a transcendent fundamental or spiritual reality; a verified or indisputable fact, proposition, principle, or the like.”

Americans today have lost this belief. We have largely accepted the lies of relative moralism, which declare that no universal standard exists to judge right or wrong, that what is right today is wrong tomorrow, that what is wrong in China, is right in America. Every ethical position can change based on circumstance or personal preference. The belief in right and wrong, or good and evil, has been declared obsolete in our society.

These two positions cannot be reconciled. Either universal truth exists or it doesn’t. Either we support the propositions our country was formed on, or we don’t. I believe, along with our founders, that some truths are self-evident. If we look at some examples, I think we can all agree that at least some truth does not change.

  • The TSA agent who interrogates and terrifies a three-year-old is wrong.
  • Torturing prisoners at Gitmo in unspeakable ways is wrong.
  • Fining homeowners who protect their property with a firebreak is wrong.
  • A BART cop who shot an unarmed man in the back was wrong.
  • Taking kids from their “old” grandparents and arbitrarily giving them to a gay couple is wrong.
  • Covering up the brutal rape and murder of a 19-year-old Army private in Iraq is wrong.

The list is endless, and if you want to get really riled, read through my posts on abuse of power. It’s one of my favorite blogging topics.

The larger point I’m making is that we all recognize injustice and abuse of power when we see it, starting with the bully on the playground. It’s self-evident.

If injustice is self-evident, then, if some truths are not relative to circumstance or personal opinion, then perhaps our founders list of truths carry weight, after all. Perhaps we need to re-examine just what it is that we believe. Perhaps good and evil really do exist.

As this post is already longer than I had planned, I will end it by saying … to be continued.

Share
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
5 Responses
  1. Hercules Mulligan says:

    So true. Sounds like another person is starting to make sense. When I have some more time, I’ll check out the article you quoted from.

    Sorry I didn’t participate in this week’s Word for Wednesday. So sorry! I promise I will do double next week, OK?

    BTW: I see you’ve joined BlogCatalog. So, I added you to my friends list, fav’d your blog, and gave your blog a review. :) Hope you like it.

    Happy FFQF! :)

  2. Jim Wetzel says:

    I’m looking forward to the continuation.

    Each of your “bullet points” above illustrate the critical difference between power and authority. I think everyday life tends to be tolerable in direct proportion to the extent to which power and authority reside together. It may be that the dysfunction of our society could usefully be analyzed in terms of the powerlessness of those who have real authority, and the power enjoyed by those who lack real authority.

  3. akaGaGa says:

    Thanks, Herky, I’m trying to find my way around Blogcatalog and Twitter all at once. I don’t know what possessed me! :) And yes, you’re forgiven – especially as I didn’t do FFQF today!

    Interesting point, Jim. I might add responsibility to the power and authority. I’d like to hear your definition of authority and where it comes from, and how it should be used.

    BTW … I think this is a first. Have you ever left a comment before that didn’t leave me rolling in laughter? :)

  4. J. P. Schilling says:

    Hear Ye! Hear Ye! Hear Ye!

    Bravo! It is about time for those of us who have given their lives over to Christ and can make clear the connotations of right and wrong to begin to ‘school’ as it were the younger generations.

    I mentioned to Herky that my traffic goes up on FFQF and I get a lot of comments albeit, email, on-site, phone, or otherwise about how interested people are in the ‘Founding Documents.’

    Hmm, why? You described it rather well; it’s almost a mindless society that just will not make a stand–yet, unfortunately we must!

    I think some people have completely forgotten what made (makes?) America great. You my friend, are one of those elements.
    Cheers,

    jps

  5. akaGaGa says:

    Thanks, JP, but I don’t often feel like I’m making anything “great.” More often, I feel like I’m running against the wind. :)