Archive for the Category » human rights «

November 17th, 2008 | Author:

From CNN without editorial comment from moi:


An extensive federal report released Monday concludes that roughly one in four of the 697,000 U.S. veterans of the 1990-91 Gulf War suffer from Gulf War illness.

That illness is a condition now identified as the likely consequence of exposure to toxic chemicals, including pesticides and a drug administered to protect troops against nerve gas.

“This is a bittersweet victory, [because] this is what Gulf War veterans have been saying all along,” Hardie said at a news conference in Washington. “Years were squandered by the federal government … trying to disprove that anything could be wrong with Gulf War veterans.”

Share
October 28th, 2008 | Author:

I just came across a site called Project Censored, that takes a well-researched look at the “news that didn’t make the News.” (hat tip to J.D. Tuccille at Disloyal Opposition) Project Censored has a list of the Top 25 Censored Stories and it’s well worth your time to read. In fact, I think we are all obligated to know what the government is doing in our name. As Patrick Henry stated:

The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government — lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.

I haven’t read through the whole list yet, but here are a few that caught my attention.

#1. Over One Million Iraqi Deaths Caused by US Occupation

Based on multiple studies that the government denies and the mainstream media ignores, approximately 1.2 million Iraqis have died, and about 5 million are refugees, as a result of the US invasion and occupation. This is more than died in the Rwandan genocide in 1994. Every month that we stay, another 10,000 people are killed.

#5. Seizing War Protesters’ Assets

President Bush has signed two executive orders that would allow the US Treasury Department to seize the property of any person perceived to, directly or indirectly, pose a threat to US operations in the Middle East.

Vaguely worded to allow inclusion of most anybody who disagrees with our wars, the act further authorizes freezing the assets of “a spouse or dependent child” of any person whose property is frozen. The executive order on Lebanon also bans providing food, shelter, medicine, or any humanitarian aid to those whose assets have been seized—including the “dependent children” referred to above.

#6. The Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act

In a startling affront to American freedoms of expression, privacy, and association, the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act (H.R. 1955) passed the House on October 23, 2007, by a vote of 404–6. The Senate is currently considering a companion bill, S. 1959. The act would establish a national commission and a university-based “Center for Excellence” to study and propose legislation to prevent the threat of “radicalization” of Americans.

Author of the bill Jane Harman (D-CA) explains, “We’re studying the phenomenon of people with radical beliefs who turn into people who would use violence.”

“Radical beliefs” like … First Amendment rights, for instance? Joe Liberman is pushing this bill, and demanded that YouTube take down “Islamic propaganda” videos. With a few exceptions, they refused. Return to McCarthyism, anyone?

#25. Bush’s Real Problem wtih Eliot Spitzer

The exposure of New York State Governor Eliot Spitzer’s tryst with a luxury call girl had little to do with the Bush administration’s high moral standards for public servants. Author F. William Engdahl advises that, “in evaluating spectacular scandals around prominent public figures, it is important to ask what and who might want to eliminate that person.” Timing suggests that Spitzer was likely a target of a White House and Wall Street operation to silence one of its most dangerous and vocal critics of their handling of the current financial market crisis.

It seems Spitzer wrote an editorial in the Washington Post that said, in part, “Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to protect consumers, it embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented campaign to prevent states from protecting their residents from the very problems to which the federal government was turning a blind eye.”

* * *

While Bush and all those in Washington will someday have to account for their actions before our Maker, we will someday have to account for our inactions.

O my God,
I am ashamed and embarrassed
to lift up my face to You, my God,
for our iniquities have risen above our heads
and our guilt has grown even to the heavens.
Ezra 9:6


Share
October 24th, 2008 | Author:

I’m no lawyer, but it seems to me that our country now has three types of prisoners.

Category I: Criminals

Those who are suspected of violating the laws of the United States can be arrested and jailed. However, they are theoretically subject to the protections of the Bill of Rights and other laws, and we can’t just arrest someone and throw away the key.

Category II: Prisoners of War

Those who are fighting against our country in a military capacity can also be jailed. They, however, are subject to the rights proscribed in the Geneva Convention.

Category III: Enemy Combatants

Bush and his neo-con handlers don’t like the first two categories, because they demand that these prisoners be treated like … well, people. You know, with truth and justice and all that. So they created a new category called “Enemy Combatants” and guess what? They don’t have any rights. They can be captured any place in the world and transported to the prison at Guantanamo Bay, and held for as long as the military wants.

For instance, there is “Internment Serial Number 669.” (Yeah, they don’t even like to acknowledge that he has a name. ) He was arrested/captured/kidnapped (pick one) in 2002 in Pakistan, and has been held without charges ever since. That’s six years, folks. Now, if that was me, I would be a little ticked off, and apparently so is Ahmed Zaid Zuhair.

“ISN 669 has a very long history of disciplinary violations and noncompliant, resistant and combative behavior,” according to Army Col. Bruce Vargo, commander of Guantanamo Bay’s guards.

Well, yeah. Six years is a very long time. And as we would say when we were kids, “How would you like it???” He’s been one of many on a hunger strike, they’ve been force-feeding him through his nose, and it’s not at all a pretty picture. He does have a lawyer now and some papers have been filed in federal court in Washington – but it’s still six years later.

There is finally a court battle taking place where the “Justice” Department and the prisoner’s lawyers are battling over just what this third category of “enemy combatant” means. U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon is expected to issue his own definition Monday before beginning weeks of hearings over whether the men at Guantanamo may be detained legally. Meanwhile, the clock keeps ticking.

I suspect that ISN 669 is probably not a very nice guy, but we as a nation should not be allowed to run around the world and scoop up all the not-very-nice-guys … because that makes us worse than them.

Never pay back evil for evil to anyone. Respect what is right in the sight of all men. If possible, so far as it depends on you, be at peace with all men. Never take your own revenge, beloved, but leave room for the wrath of God, for it is written, “VENGEANCE IS MINE, I WILL REPAY,” says the Lord. “BUT IF YOUR ENEMY IS HUNGRY, FEED HIM, AND IF HE IS THIRSTY, GIVE HIM A DRINK; FOR IN SO DOING YOU WILL HEAP BURNING COALS ON HIS HEAD.” Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good. (Romans 12:17-21)

Share
October 08th, 2008 | Author:

The feds admitted in 2004 that 17 Chinese Muslims we’ve imprisoned since 2001 are not “enemy combatants,” but a federal appeals court stayed a lower court order to release them. CNN reports that the issues are complicated. If we return them to China, they will likely be persecuted – but we don’t want them, and neither does anyone else.

Perhaps if we didn’t run around the world scooping up people who might or might not be “enemies,” we – and the 17 Chinese – wouldn’t be in this fix.

Share
September 19th, 2008 | Author:

[This post is part of the Favorite Founders' Quote Friday sponsored by Meet the Founding Fathers. Go to the site to see who else has participated today.]


The world, the flesh, and all the devils in hell are arrayed against any man who now in this North American Union shall dare to join the standard of Almighty God to put down the African slave-trade; and what can I, upon the verge of my seventy-fourth birthday, with a shaking hand, a darkening eye, a drowsy brain, and with all my faculties dropping from me one by one, do for the cause of God and man, for the progress of human emancipation, for the suppression of African slave trade? Yet my conscience presses me on; let me die but upon the breach.

John Quincy Adams
diary entry, spring 1841

As Adams poured himself out to put down the African slave trade, it seems there should be those among us, equally devoted, equally pressed by conscience, and appointed by God, to defend the right of life and liberty of the unborn. May God raise up a man from the mold of John Quincy Adams.

Share
Category: FFQF, human rights  | 4 Comments